On 8/9/11 5:43 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
A broader OSGi "support" for UIMA could be done, where we make UIMA aware of
OSGi, and have it use OSGi "services" to load classes from bundles, etc., but
that hasn't been done.
Let me know if this is off-base with respect to use cases you know about...; any
testing appreciated:-)
Well, I am still skeptical if it is a good idea to release this. Because
it might
simply not work for many.
As soon as a user wants to mix the addon AEs with a custom AEs he needs
to repackage everything.
Why not directly tell our users, that they need to put everything into one
bundle them self to get UIMA running in an OSGi container?
Jörn
