[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13083406#comment-13083406
]
Jörn Kottmann commented on UIMA-2206:
-------------------------------------
Large patches are also "difficult" to apply, it can take ages to get the commit
done, and it often might just stop in between. Maybe I am doing something wrong.
Anyway, what do you think if I simply rename these projects in subversion for
you?
Or did you already merged them?
Otherwise you might be able to split up your changes into multiple patches?
> Further restructuring and renaming of the TextMarker projects
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: UIMA-2206
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2206
> Project: UIMA
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: TextMarker
> Reporter: Peter Klügl
> Assignee: Peter Klügl
>
> The TextMarker projects should be further restructured, especially the dltk
> plugins should be merged. That will ease the migration to the maven build
> process. The engine project should then be separated to a normal java project
> and a fetcher plugin. This will be done not until the migration to maven.
> This restructuring enforces some renaming. Therefore, also additional
> renaming is performed in this task. All projects will be adapted to the UIMA
> convention for eclipse plugins. The namespaces will be unified to
> org.apache.uima.textmarker.* and the mention of dltk will be replaced by ide.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
