Thanks Marshall, will let you know how it goes.
Tommaso

2011/8/16 Marshall Schor <[email protected]>

> The OSGi build has been redone with an approximation to the version
> information.
>
> The maven-bundle-plugin version was reset back to 2.1.0, which adds a
> version
> number for all packages in the export list.  This approach is not in line
> with
> the OSGi model, which wants each "package" to have its own version, but it
> is
> probably enough to get going.
>
> Tommaso, it would be good if you could update from trunk and rebuild the
> OSGi
> plugins and retest.
>
> -Marshall
>
> On 8/15/2011 10:21 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> > Tommaso has done some testing, and found that the MANIFEST files don't
> contain
> > the versions exported so that other bundles (the ones 'using' the
> annotators)
> > which declare to import packages of a certain version cannot be started
> > correctly even if the annotator bundle was correctly started:
> > ...
> > [ 128] [Active     ] [    5] UIMA Annotator: AlchemyAPIAnnotator
> (2.3.1.SNAPSHOT)
> > [ 129] [Active     ] [    5] UIMA Annotator: OpenCalaisAnnotator
> (2.3.1.SNAPSHOT)
> > [ 131] [Active     ] [    5] Clerezza - Apache UIMA related ontologies
> > (0.1.0.incubating-SNAPSHOT)
> > [ 132] [Active     ] [    5] UIMA Eclipse: uimaj-ep-runtime (2.3.1)
> > ...
> > start
> file:/Users/tommaso/Documents/uima.utils-0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
> > org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in bundle
> > org.apache.clerezza.uima.utils [135]: Unable to resolve 135.0: missing
> > requirement [135.0] package;
> > (&(package=org.apache.uima.alchemy.ts.categorization)(version>=2.3.0))
> >
> > If I run 'inspect package capability <bundleid>' for OpenCalaisAnnotator
> I get:
> > inspect package capability 129
> > org.apache.uima.OpenCalaisAnnotator [129] exports packages:
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > org.apache.uima.annotator.calais; version=0.0.0
> > org.apache.uima.calais; version=0.0.0
> >
> > -Marshall (copying part of note from Tommaso)
> >
>

Reply via email to