On 8/22/11 8:57 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
I think I'm now tilting toward leaving the OSGi packaging (with UIMA framework
classes packaged with the annotator) out of the release.
This is because it seems to me this is not the right way to do OSGi (as is being
discussed), and realistically, I don't think it's very usable as currently
packaged. I don't think we want to encourage this style of OSGi adoption.
+1, I also believe it is not a good idea to release this, because people
will then
mistakenly assume that UIMA works nicely in an OSGi environment.
I would rather work toward a more functional packaging.
+1, I will try to help here
Tommaso (and others who would like this to be released in its current form, or
with the additional change of exporting the UIMA framework packages), how
significantly will you be impacted if this isn't released at this time?
I don't think it has an impact, because we only need to feel responsible
for things we released.
Jörn
