Well, my intent is to reduce confusion :-) So, I'm willing to change this. Can we hear from others re: what they feel is the least confusing way to label these?
-Marshall On 12/5/2011 2:15 PM, Jörn Kottmann wrote: > On 12/5/11 4:30 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: >> The reason it is named with (includes Runtime) is to create an expectation >> that >> the user just has to check this box. If we left off this phrase, users would >> likely wonder if they had to also check the Runtime. >> >> However, as you've noticed, it "just works" - whether or not the user checks >> UIMA Runtime, so in some sense, it doesn't really matter - other than to >> reduce >> some potential uncertainty in some users. I guess I'd like to keep it as it >> is, >> for that reason. > > This is not an eclipse convention and I wonder if this really reduces > uncertainty. > > I went to this site with the intention to install both the Runtime and Tools > plugins, now it made > me wonder for a moment if the Tools in some way include a different Runtime > than the one above. > > I then tried both and the dependencies on the next page made it clear to me > that it simply > means that Tools has a dependency on Runtime which is automatically resolved > for me, > since that is just expected behavior such a note can also be confusing. > > Jörn >
