[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13185048#comment-13185048
 ] 

Peter Klügl commented on UIMA-2330:
-----------------------------------

I have not included the changes I proposed in the description now, because 
getting possibly several annotations when calling something like moveToNext() 
is probably not intuitive for UIMA users. Instead, the filtering will behave 
greedy: All annotations will be ignored by rule matches if they are part of an 
annotation with a filtered type.
                
> Improve rule matching for filtered types
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: UIMA-2330
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2330
>             Project: UIMA
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: TextMarker
>            Reporter: Peter Klügl
>            Assignee: Peter Klügl
>
> Improve rule matching for filtered types: Validate the behavior of the 
> TextMarker rules for different configurations of filtering settings and add 
> unit tests. When finding new anchors for rule elements the next annotations 
> should also consider offsets after annotations of filtered types. This should 
> result in a even better filtered inference than the old paradigm based on 
> TextMarkerBasics and their stored anchors.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Reply via email to