Am 25.08.2012 um 17:43 schrieb Richard Eckart de Castilho:
> Am 23.08.2012 um 20:52 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>
>> On 8/23/2012 12:03 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
>>> Am 23.08.2012 um 17:52 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>
>>>> The "secretary" is shorthand for [email protected], I believe :-)
>>>>> Most contributors have been affiliated with either of these two
>>>>> institutions when they were working on uimaFIT. One of the uimaFIT core
>>>>> developers (Steven) has continued contributing as private persons after
>>>>> leaving the respective institution. One contributor mentioned in the
>>>>> source code (Fabio) has affirmed by mail that there is no objection
>>>>> against a grant and claims no IP. Please advice if we need a separate SGA
>>>>> signed by the two uimaFIT contributors who have contributed on the
>>>>> project partly or completely as a private person.
>>>> We need some documentation, either an SGA, or an ICLA (if the contribution
>>>> is
>>>> minor), signed by all people who are part of this contribution. The SGA
>>>> is for
>>>> both individuals and corporations.
>
> We have been able to find the original diff contributed to uimaFIT by Fabio.
> The patch adds support for FlowControllers in several places in uimaFIT. The
> diff is quite large (~77kb), but many changes seem to be due to reformatting
> (i.e. the diff was not optimized to a minimal change set). It seems to have
> been a one-time contribution by Fabio which has been integrated into uimaFIT
> by Philip in a modified/extended from. The diff is attached to this issue:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/uimafit/issues/detail?id=16
>
> The changes were integrated in this revision along with additional related
> changes by Philip:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/uimafit/source/detail?r=257
>
> I'd like to know how to judge if a contribution is minor (requires an ICLA)
> or major (requires an SGA). Given the scope and one-time nature of the
> contribution, I'd be inclined to call it a minor contribution which would
> call for an ICLA (potentially CCLA, depending if Fabio thinks an employer at
> the time could claim ownership).
Fabio himself says he considers his contribution mainly consulting, so an ICLA
should be sufficient I think.
So, then the form of the contribution package probably has to be resolved next
in order to fix a hash which can be put on the SGA.
Is the ZIP of the current trunk and wiki sufficient? If not, which other form
would you prefer?
http://code.google.com/p/uimafit/downloads/detail?name=uimaFIT-grant-staging-rev-919.zip
-- Richard
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard Eckart de Castilho
Technical Lead
Ubiquitous Knowledge Processing Lab (UKP-TUD)
FB 20 Computer Science Department
Technische Universität Darmstadt
Hochschulstr. 10, D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany
phone [+49] (0)6151 16-7477, fax -5455, room S2/02/B117
[email protected]
www.ukp.tu-darmstadt.de
Web Research at TU Darmstadt (WeRC) www.werc.tu-darmstadt.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
