I see in the staging area for the files, http://people.apache.org/~bhavani/uimacpp-release-candidates/2.4.0/08/ <http://people.apache.org/%7Ebhavani/uimacpp-release-candidates/2.4.0/08/> , that all the files except 1 have the name pattern uimacpp-2.4.0-*. The one that doesn't is named uimacpp-bin64-linux-report.txt. I don't think this should block the release, but should it be fixed (to follow the other file naming conventions)?
-Marshall On 11/4/2012 6:01 PM, Bhavani Iyer wrote: > Thanks Burn. > I believe these are small changes to the example UIMA AS deployment > descriptor. > So I think the release candidate stands. > Please test UIMA C++ RC 8 and vote. > > Thanks > Bhavani > > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Burn Lewis <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I found a couple of small problems in the readme's & example code (fixed in >> UIMA-2476) but there are more changes on the UIMA-AS side necessary for the >> deployment of C++ services as a separate process (UIMA-2474) >> >> ~Burn >>
