+1 I think many of our builds would "fail" to pass some of these tools, so we would need a way to gradually improve over time to a point where they did pass :-)
-Marshall On 1/4/2013 3:08 AM, Tommaso Teofili (JIRA) wrote: > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13543689#comment-13543689 > ] > > Tommaso Teofili commented on UIMA-2548: > --------------------------------------- > > I agree with Richard, having such tools analysis as an optional profile would > be the best. > > >> Perform code review / analysis >> ------------------------------ >> >> Key: UIMA-2548 >> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2548 >> Project: UIMA >> Issue Type: Improvement >> Components: addons >> Affects Versions: 2.3.1Addons >> Reporter: Tommaso Teofili >> Fix For: 2.4.0Addons >> >> >> Perform code analysis and review in order to improve performance and usage >> of correct Java constructs. > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators > For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira >
