On 1/9/2013 10:06 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> next question about "Building The Release Candidate"
>
> I did now a trial build of the release candidate with "mvn install
> -Papache-release". The only thing that looks not correct is the naming of the
> pom for the Eclipse plugins, for example:
>
> org.apache.uima.textmarker.addons_${parsedVersion.osgiVersion}.pom
>
> Do I have to take care of that? This happens also for the CAS Editor plugin in
> my workspace.Can you say a bit more for those of us not following all the details :-) - for instance, what should this be changed to, and where in the build (what part of the build) is this being done? > > What is the next step? Should I already add the server properties to my > settings.xml as described here [1], or is there an intermediate step, e.g., > uploading the trial to my people.apache.org webspace? You can add the server properties to your settings.xml, but please use the encryption technique. This would enable you to upload snapshots to the repository.apache.org server, for instance. Before doing a release, we need to finish the ip clearance process, too. -Marshall > > Best, > > Peter > > [1] http://maven.apache.org/developers/committer-settings.html > > > On 08.01.2013 22:40, Peter Klügl wrote: >> I have found the problem by taking a closer look at the uima-as pom. -> >> plugin version + config >> >> Can someone verify if the org.apache.uima:parent-pom works correctly? It did >> not work for me and I think it needs to be updates for Jira >4. >> The maven-changes-plugin version points to 2.6, for example. >> >> Peter >> >> >> Am 08.01.2013 13:55, schrieb Peter Klügl: >>> Hi, >>> >>> next question about "Preparing The Sourcecode For The Release". >>> >>> I added the jiraVersion property. However, if I try to generate the report >>> with "mvn changes:jira-report -N", then I get an exception: >>> >>> org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoExecutionException: Failed to parse JIRA XML. >>> Caused by: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: The element type "meta" must be >>> terminated by the matching end-tag "</meta>". >>> >>> A short google search indicates that the configuration in the pom is >>> probably not correct. However, the related definitions are located in the >>> org.apache.uima:parent-pom. >>> >>> Did I miss something, or do I have to override something in >>> uimaj-textmarker-parent? >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> >>> On 21.12.2012 11:12, Peter Klügl wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> the next two questions: >>>> >>>> 1. Release Discussions - Release Plan >>>> >>>> http://uima.apache.org/release.html says: "At the beginning of the "UIMA >>>> Release Process" there must be consensus in the developer community about >>>> the JIRA issues that should be part of the next release and the time frame >>>> for the release..." >>>> >>>> Here's a list of unresolved issues: >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20component%20%3D%20TextMarker%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC >>>> >>>> UIMA-2285 (Write documentation for the TextMarker projects) will be >>>> resolved before the release as it is almost done. >>>> UIMA-2528 (Open CAS Editor blocks eclipse start) is almost a blocker, but I >>>> fear that I won't be able to change anything in the TextMarker projects >>>> that will fix this problem. >>>> >>>> If there are no objections, then I will to move all the unresolved issues >>>> to the next version (2.0.1). >>>> >>>> >>>> 2. Preparing the Jira for the Release >>>> >>>> "...and that the "Fixed in release xxx" is set for each Jira issue that is >>>> part of the release." >>>> >>>> "There is a saved "filter" you can adjust for this that will display all >>>> fixed Jira issues with no Fixed in release xxx assigned. You can go through >>>> subsets of this (use the filter to pick the subset you want) and do "bulk >>>> Jira changes" to update multiples of these in parallel, if that makes >>>> sense." >>>> >>>> Is this necessary that all issues are updated as it will be the first >>>> relase of the TextMarker system? And if yes, where can I find this filter? >>>> >>>> >>>> Peter >>>> >>>> >>>> On 12.12.2012 17:33, Peter Klügl wrote: >>>>> Hmm, good point. Then, I prefer 2.0.0 >>>>> >>>>> Peter >>>>> >>>>> On 12.12.2012 17:28, Jörn Kottmann wrote: >>>>>> On 12/12/2012 05:21 PM, Peter Klügl wrote: >>>>>>> Ok, after all comments, I think the TextMarker release number should be >>>>>>> 1.0.0. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It will confuse people when you release under a lower version number as >>>>>> you did before. >>>>>> I suggest to increment the version either to 1.6.0 or if there have been >>>>>> significant changes to >>>>>> 2.0.0. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Jörn, do you have an opinion about the additional CAS Editor views >>>>>>> (uimaj-ep-textmarker-caseditor)? They have no dependency to TextMarker, >>>>>>> only to the two CAS Editor projects. I will simply release them together >>>>>>> with TextMarker. >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Jörn >>>> >>>> > >
