There are two things I noticed so far:
- When I try to install the feature in Eclipse, then it is not
categorized and thus not visible with the default settings. Somehow, the
update site is not correctly built with the categories. However, the
installed feature works just fine (Win7 64bit).
- the poms of the plugins have some naming problems. This is probably
caused by using a property, which is not resolved by some maven plugin.
Example: org.apache.uima.textmarker.addons_${parsedVersion.osgiVersion}.pom
in:
http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/TextMarker-2.0.0-rc1/src_bin/
Peter
On 23.01.2013 18:02, Peter Klügl wrote:
Hi,
the first release candidate of the sandbox project Apache UIMA
TextMarker is ready for voting.
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-163/
SVN tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/sandbox/TextMarker/tags/uimaj-textmarker-parent-2.0.0-rc1
Archive with all sources:
http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/TextMarker-2.0.0-rc1/uimaj-textmarker-parent-2.0.0-source-release.zip
Eclipse update site:
http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/TextMarker-2.0.0-rc1/eclipse-update-site
The update site only contains the UIMA TextMarker plugins and is not
yet integrated in the composite repository because the composite
repository is not yet officially released.
Binaries and sources:
http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/TextMarker-2.0.0-rc1/src_bin
The issues fixed are in the RELEASE_NOTES.html in the src/bin packages.
They can also be found here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.0.0TextMarker%22%20AND%20component%20%3D%20TextMarker%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
As it is the first release, the report contains all fixed issues.
Documentation (pdf file):
http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/TextMarker-2.0.0-rc1/tools.textmarker.book.pdf
Please vote on release:
[ ] +1 OK to release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
Thanks.
Peter
