On 2/1/2013 8:23 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: > Two things I noticed: > > 1. the footer in the documentation says: UIMA Version 2.0.0. I will take a > look where I can override the product. > > 2. what about the license of the uimaj-eclipse-feature-tools? Do we need to > mention the icons? The binaries in the update site are also a bit problematic.
Yes, I think the license that shows in the Eclipse install GUI for the uimaj-eclipse-feature-tools needs to mention the icons. -M > > Peter > > > > On 01.02.2013 14:15, Peter Klügl wrote: >> Hi, >> >> the third release candidate of the sandbox project Apache UIMA TextMarker is >> ready for voting. This vote also includes our new composite repository. >> >> Staging repository: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-192/ >> >> SVN tag: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/sandbox/textmarker/tags/textmarker-2.0.0-rc3 >> >> >> Composite repository with three update sites: uimaj, uima-as and >> textmarker-2.0.0: >> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc3/eclipse-update-site >> >> >> The issues fixed are in the RELEASE_NOTES.html in the src/bin packages. >> They can also be found here: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.0.0TextMarker%22%20AND%20component%20%3D%20TextMarker%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC >> >> >> >> ONLY FOR REVIEWING: >> >> Documentation (pdf file): >> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc3/tools.textmarker.book.pdf >> >> >> Archive with all sources (also present in the staging repository): >> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/textmarker-2.0.0-rc3/textmarker-2.0.0-source-release.zip >> >> >> >> Please vote on release: >> >> [ ] +1 OK to release >> [ ] 0 Don't care >> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ... >> >> Thanks. >> >> Peter > >
