Hi, I like to discuss the release plans for UIMA Ruta.
In my opinion, we should release it as soon as possible making the textmarker-2.0.0 obsolete. A new release itself is justified, because of the new name and UIMA-2757, UIMA-2756, and especially UIMA-2519. Here's the list of resolved issues since 2.0.0: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.0.1ruta%22%20AND%20component%20%3D%20ruta%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.0.1ruta%22%20AND%20component%20%3D%20ruta%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC> Which version should it be? I'd say we go with 2.0.1 even if the release isn't completely compatible with textmarker-2.0.0. However, I added an action in the Workbench, which updates most parts of old textmarker projects (file extensions, nature, descriptors). Which issues should be included? I think it would be OK to have a release only with the issues that are already (or almost) resolved. I was planning to include at least all TextRuler issues and the new contributions in 2.0.1, but that will take too long. UIMA-2758 would be really nice and important, but also some work. I suppose that UIMA-2834, UIMA-2698, UIMA-2718 (also for 2.4.1SDK), and maybe UIMA-2826 should be resolved. Here's a list of all open issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC I there are no objections, then I would start by working towards a release candidate. The next release (planned for August) would then be 2.0.2 with the new contributions, a working rule learning framework, uimaFIT support, field notation for features, speed optimizations, and the smaller issues. Best, Peter
