Am 30.05.2013 um 23:23 schrieb Jörn Kottmann <[email protected]>: > On 05/30/2013 06:01 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: >> Sure it would be nice to have it in core, in particular because the package >> names of the annotations then would not change again later. However, as I >> said when first contributing uimaFIT, there's still lots of work to be done. >> The core is expected to be really stable and is released in 0.0.x >> increments. uimaFIT is released in 0.x.0 increments and while we always >> tried to by fully backwards compatible, we sometimes failed in that. > > In other words we would have to break backward compatibility once more to > move it over at some point?
Not sure what you mean. uimaFIT 2.0.0 is backwards compatible with 1.4.0. What's broken? -- Richard
