I just now tried: 0) unzip a brand-new Eclipse 3.7.2
1) copying the plugins for base UIMA to the dropins folder 2) starting Eclipse - make a Java project, tried to make a new UIMA AE descriptor - but the UIMA pick in the context menu wasn't there. 3) Did an "install" of EMF SDK from the install-new-software page, restarted 4) Now the UIMA pick was in the context menu - I created a new AE descriptor, and it came up OK 5) checked the error log - no error showing. -Marshall On 7/2/2013 12:44 PM, Peter Klügl wrote: > Am 02.07.2013 17:45, schrieb Marshall Schor: >> I tried as follows: >> >> 1) installed a new copy of Eclipse 3.7.2 (64 bit, windows) >> >> 2) ran the install-new-software, pointed to the site generated by running the >> eclipse update site build >> >> (I don't know if drop-in works, because the install requires some prereqs >> like >> EMF tools; I don't know if these get installed when you do the drop-in). >> >> 3) made a new project, and made a new analysis engine descriptor in that >> project, which opened fine in the Component Descriptor Editor. > > I copied the plugin to the dropins folder (no installation using an update > site) of an eclipse 3.7.2, with which the plugin should have worked. I will > try to reproduce my steps when I find the time. > > Best, > > Peter > >> -Marshall >> >> On 7/2/2013 10:07 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >>> I did not check the update site when I reviewed the rc. >>> >>> However, I observed such problems when I tried to use the new runtime >>> plugin in Eclipse 3.7.2. (a few days ago) >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> >>> On 02.07.2013 16:03, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: >>>> I checked out the rc tag and built it: ok. (mvn clean install) >>>> >>>> I updated my local uimaj checkout, updated it to use the rc and built: ok. >>>> (mvn clean install) >>>> >>>> I installed the resulting Eclipse plugins in my Eclipse (dropins folder) >>>> and tried to open a type system in the component editor: >>>> ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.uima.resource.metadata.ResourceMetaData. >>>> >>>> Can anybody confirm this? >>>> >>>> -- Richard >>>> >>>> Am 01.07.2013 um 17:06 schrieb Marshall Schor <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> On 7/1/2013 11:03 AM, Marshall Schor wrote: >>>>>> On 7/1/2013 10:49 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >>>>>>> On 01.07.2013 16:44, Marshall Schor wrote: >>>>>>>> On 7/1/2013 8:50 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >>>>>>>>> Will there be another rc or should we still test the current one? >>>>>>>> I may have missed something - I haven't seen any issues yet needing >>>>>>>> fixing in >>>>>>>> these artifacts. I've removed the "excess" projects from the SVN tag, >>>>>>>> to reduce >>>>>>>> confusion (they were put there by the maven release plugin). >>>>>>> Nevermind, I did not know whether this modification causes a new >>>>>>> vote/rc. If there is still need for one more, I will cast my vote >>>>>>> tomorrow after some reviewing. >>>>>> There is so far just 1 +1 vote (mine). Need 2 more :-) >>>>> Richard may have voted +1, or may have just said +1 to my suggestion to >>>>> remove >>>>> the extra projects in the tag - Richard can you clarify? >>>>> Thanks. >>>>> -Marshall >>>>> > >
