On 26.07.2013 17:16, Marshall Schor wrote: > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1027
Ah ok, that was before my time :-) I gonna take a look at the issue. The implementation of the type was included in o.a.u.runtime-2.4.0. I have a somewhat internal type that extends that class and now its parent class is gone. Interestingly enough, there are no problems if I start a new vm when launching a Ruta script, because the classpath collector adds the uimaj-document-annotation-2.4.1.jar, which it found in the bundle. > I think if your plugin needs this, it needs to provide it - would that work? I could provide it, but I am actually removing the dependencies and the inheritance right now. I see no need to rely on that class. Maybe the jar should be removed from the runtime plugin sometime in future? Best, Peter > -Marshall > > On 7/26/2013 11:06 AM, Marshall Schor wrote: >> Thanks, Peter. >> >> If I recall, this ommission was intentional; I'll try and find the history >> behind this. I think it had to do with the fact that the Document Annotation >> class is a JCas cover class for the UIMA document annotation Type. And due >> to >> the fact (and common practice) that people "extend" UIMA types with >> additional >> features, to enable this, it was thought that the user would provide their >> (potentially) custom version of the Document Annotation class, and that >> having >> the "base" version of this JCas type in the runtime would prevent this. >> >> -Marshall >> >> On 7/26/2013 10:55 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >>> I know the vote is already closed, but I wanted to mention something anyway: >>> >>> the runtime plugin contains six jars, but the manifest lists only five >>> of them as embedded and as the additional classpath. >>> uimaj-document-annotation-2.4.1.jar is missing and this is prevents >>> other plugins to actually use the jcas class DocumentAnnotation. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 26.07.2013 16:44, Marshall Schor wrote: >>>> I try mvn deploy -Papache-release >>>> >>>> to emulate what the release process did :-)... >>>> >>>> -Marshall >>>> On 7/26/2013 10:11 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: >>>>> Hum. I guess you can check out the 2.4.1 rc4 tag from SVN and just run >>>>> "mvn deploy" to stage it again, no? >>>>> >>>>> -- Richard >>>>> >>>>> Am 26.07.2013 um 16:06 schrieb Marshall Schor <m...@schor.com>: >>>>> >>>>>> Well, not enough coffee... >>>>>> >>>>>> There were 2 things in the "staging repository" - I saw the dates, and >>>>>> thought, >>>>>> hmmm, I thought I had already dropped the older one... but maybe I'm >>>>>> mistaken, >>>>>> so I dropped it. >>>>>> >>>>>> The new one - well it turned out it wasn't "uima". >>>>>> >>>>>> So, I have accidentally dropped the staged RC4 candidate on the staging >>>>>> Nexus >>>>>> repository at repository.apache.org. I'm asking on the repository >>>>>> mailing list >>>>>> if there's any recovery for this (short of re-doing the release >>>>>> candidate...). >>>>>> >>>>>> If not, I apologize for this error, but will need to redo this release... >>>>>> >>>>>> -Marshall
