On 03.12.2013, at 18:52, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 12/3/2013 3:37 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
>> Is it documented somewhere what constitutes a release per Apache conventions?
>> I would imagine that a PMC could decide that certain releases are only made
>> on Maven Central and only specific releases are made as binary and source
>> bundles that go through the Apache mirroring/archive system.
> 
> There was a discussion somewhere (I'd have to search) that says because 
> Apache's
> mission is to produce source code (not those exact words...) projects need to 
> do
> source releases, and can optionally do binary convenience packages.  The 
> source
> code must be published on the Apache distribution system as part of the 
> release.
> 
> Because of this, the Maven project, which produces lots of maven plugins that
> are only used via Maven Central, started to publish as part of their release
> process, the sources on the Apache distribution system.  See
> http://www.apache.org/dist/maven/plugins/

I see.

>> On 03.12.2013, at 18:33, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> hmmm,
>>> 
>>> Apache projects are not allowed to "publish" things without doing the 
>>> release
>>> process.
>>> 
>>> I think the main principle would be:
>>> 
>>>   For addons, do a "release" of each one whenever it seems appropriate, and 
>>> then,
>>>   From time to time - do a bundled milestone release (like Eclipse).

I wonder if the extra work is worth it. The addons appear to be quite diverse. 
I wonder
if people really use a larger number of them and would benefit from a bundled 
release.

Anyway, we should do whatever is helping to keep those addons in which people 
have
active interest spinning.

Regarding the doing it like Eclipse: we might also consider to forego bundled 
releases
for the addons, and instead do a global UIMA release bundle every once in a 
while, 
including UIMA-AS, DUCC, ruta, etc. all in versions that are compatible with 
each other.
I think having a reference for users about which versions go well together may 
be more
important than a ZIP which contains a couple of addons that do not really 
relate to 
each other.

-- Richard

Reply via email to