running uima-ducc-duccdocs with the RAT exclude for **/*.tex removed, didn't show any missing license headers :-)
-Marshall On 1/15/2014 3:33 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: > Some things to look at: > > 1) The parent-pom rat excludes is too broad. e.g: no checks for tex files - > this doesn't seem right. > > 2) parent-pom rat excludes excludes non-existent files, e.g. > src/main/resources/docbook-shared/titlepage/*.xsl, .pydevproject > > 3) latex build has some errors. > > It looks like the duccbook.tex and the installation.tex books each have > "latex " run 3 times in sequence on them (a total of 6 invocations). The > last > run still shows errors, including undefined references. There are also other > kinds of errors, such as > cannot determine size of graphic in images, > problem with 'list' environment > > 4) in the duccbook INSTALL file, the name of UIMA is spelled UIMATM - which I > think is a problem with the "trademark" approach. > > 5) duccbook publication dates are formatted unconventionally, so that dates > like > January 7, 2014, are formatted as 07-01-2014 which would likely be taken to be > July 1st, 2014. > > -Marshall >
