Downloaded binary tarball verified md5sum installed on our small test cluster ran a try3 consisting of 30 jobs & APs
[X] +1 OK to release On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Lou DeGenaro <[email protected]>wrote: > Download and unzipped binary tarball > Installed on uima-ducc-vm.apache.org following instructions for "Install > WebServer Demo" on wiki @ > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/UIMA/DUCC#DUCC-t2 > Ran 1.job > > Also, followed notes to run with simulated agents > Ran 1.job > Registered and started a service > > All OK. > > [X] +1 OK to release > > See it live @ http://uima-ducc-vm.apache.org:42133 > > Lou. > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Downloaded and unzipped source tarball - OK > > Built from source - OK > > Ran 1.job - OK > > > > Based on RC9 testing and the above: > > > > [X] +1 OK to release > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Downloaded artifacts, did spot checking on signatures - OK > > > > > > Compared binary download to rc9 - only found time stamp diffs, and the > 1 > > > change > > > in the ducc.properties file for ducc.agent.launcher.cgroups.enable. > > > READMEs, > > > LICENSE/NOTICE compared the same. > > > > > > Compare of sources for rc9 / rc10 show only the ducc.properties change, > > > too. > > > > > > built from source - OK > > > > > > Based on this and the previous RC9 checking, > > > > > > [X] +1 OK to release > > > > > > -Marshall Schor > > > > > >
