+1, checked bin and source releases, svn tag, build succeeds on all of
them, license / notice in place: everything looks good.

Regards,
Tommaso


2014-05-06 22:46 GMT+02:00 Marshall Schor <[email protected]>:

> Hi,
>
> I've posted the UIMAJ SDK 2.6.0 rc5 release candidate.
>
> Changes since rc4: small findbugs fixes including refactoring in a test
> case, plus yet another run at getting the JCasHashMap and tests to work in
> multiple core sizes of test machines.
>
> Previous changes:
>
> rc1: mainly related to enabling exploitation of multi-core processors,
> rc2: fixes 2 additional Jiras: one related to a bad refactoring that
> caused a problem serializing descriptors to XML, and one to support
> multi-threaded access to read-only CASes which requires that the
> JCasHashMap be thread safe),
> rc3: fixes some additional issues with JCasHashMap involving
> multithreading, size reporting, and performance under multiple threads
> (contention).
> rc4: Fixed bugs in JCasHashMap and its test cases, that were found when
> testing on a 32 core processor.
>
> Changes:
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3807?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.0SDK%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC
>
>
> The source and binary zip/tars and the Eclipse update site are staged to
> http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uimaj-2.6.0-rc5/ <
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uimaj-2.6.0-rc5/
> >
>
> The Maven artifacts are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1021/
>
> The SVN tags are here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.6.0/
>
> and for the Eclipse Update Site (just for the record, no real need to
> check anything here):
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-eclipse-update-site-2.6.0/
>
> See http://uima.apache.org/testing-builds.html for suggestions on how to
> test
> release candidates.
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0   Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Marshall
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to