great! thanks for the feedback! -Marshall
On 12/24/2014 3:20 PM, Burn Lewis wrote:
> re the documentation of some of the new flags:
>
> 2.4.1.5 in References - typo "equlivance"
>
> 5.6.4 in References says you must addToIndexes after setting the keys, but
> then goes on to show how to use protectIndices without clearly stating that
> this is one of three approaches.
>
> The block about -Duima.allow_duplicate_add_to_indices should be moved as
> it is in the middle of the corrupted index section.
>
> Also we should be consistent in spelling indexes/indices ... I think we're
> stuck with the American spelling now ... I don't see any 'indices' in the
> 2.6 docs.
>
> 4.5 in References shows how to use protectIndices but perhaps should
> instead link to the larger discussion in 5.6.4
>
> 10.2 in References describes -Duima.report_fs_update_corrupts_index but
> doesn't give an example of the report message, or what to search for in the
> logs.
>
> When describing uima.protect_indices_from_key_updates perhaps say that when
> false it acts like pre-2.7.0 and corruption is not detected (is this
> correct?) Presumably avoiding the check saves some CPU ... significant?
>
> In the README Index Corruption section it might help to add a little more
> comparing the three ways to deal with it ... let UIMA fix it, or explicit
> remove/add, or protect block. Also would help to say what to look for in
> the logs. Or simply refer to the References section.
>
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for testing :-)
>>
>> Some issues have been found, so I'm going to do another RC after addressing
>> those. If you have any more issues to report from your testing, please do
>> so :-)
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>> On 12/22/2014 10:41 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
>>> Eclipse install OK - ran CDE on luna (4.4.1)
>>>
>>> signatures OK
>>>
>>> binary distr: adjust example paths OK, run document Analyzer OK
>>>
>>> compare svn tag with source-release - OK (note that some cpe test
>> checkpoint
>>> artifacts sneaked into the source-release)
>>>
>>> build-from-source -
>>>
>>> issues fixed -OK
>>>
>>> spot check of Javadocs - OK
>>>
>>> check of licenses for JSON Jackson-core 2.4.2 info - verified license
>> and notice
>>> are copied appropriately
>>> Spot check of several jar license/notice - OK
>>>
>>> Check of source and bin distr license / notice - OK.
>>>
>>> build from source-release..zip - OK
>>>
>>> spot check of repository.a.o - verified files were there, were signed.
>>>
>>> [X] +1 OK to release
>>>
>>> -Marshall
>>>
>>> On 12/19/2014 6:01 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I've posted the UIMAJ SDK 2.7.0 rc2 release candidate. (This is the
>> first to be put up for a vote, because rc1 failed to get uploaded to the
>> repository staging area for unknown reasons)
>>>> This version has lots of changes. These are summarized in the README
>> and RELEASE_NOTES.
>>>> The list of changes in Jira:
>>>>
>>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.7.0SDK%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC
>>>> The source and binary zip/tars and the Eclipse update site are staged to
>>>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uimaj-2.7.0-rc2/ <
>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uimaj-2.7.0-rc2/
>>>> The Maven artifacts are here:
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1042/
>>>>
>>>> The SVN tags are here:
>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.7.0/
>>>>
>>>> and for the Eclipse Update Site:
>>>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-eclipse-update-site-2.7.0/
>>>> See http://uima.apache.org/testing-builds.html for suggestions on how
>> to test
>>>> release candidates.
>>>>
>>>> Please vote on release:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> -Marshall
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
