> > > Sorry Eddie, I think I missed the specific point you were making about > inter-process as an preferred alternative to JNI-based usage of UIMACPP. > Given that though, it sounds like the new obj CAS impl will already work > fine (since its currently Xmi-based) without any more work needed. > Changing the UIMA C++ JMS code to support different serialization formats > would presumably only be worth doing anyhow if there is some > demand/requirement out there for it? >
Well, interprocess is certainly my preference, but it would be wrong to assume that the JNI interface could just be dropped. It should be OK to replace the JNI interface with some other serialization. My preference there would be the compressed binary CAS with a delta CAS reply :) Eddie
