[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-4275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jim Challenger reopened UIMA-4275:
----------------------------------

Add support for class-level fair-share caps.

> DUCC RM: Rework constraints on class usage
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: UIMA-4275
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-4275
>             Project: UIMA
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: DUCC
>    Affects Versions: 1.1.0-Ducc
>            Reporter: Jim Challenger
>            Assignee: Jim Challenger
>             Fix For: 2.0.0-Ducc
>
>
> The current class constraints are per-allocation and not sufficiently 
> constraining in that a user can dominate a cluster with many requests for 
> non-preemptable shares.
> There are proposals for user-based limits (max allocations per user), 
> group-based limits (group membership determines limits), and project-based 
> limits (submission to authorized projects determines limits).
> The final decision is still open.  This JIRA will track progress and 
> eventually, the implementation.
> 2015-03-06
> Consulting with actual users, the preference is for user-based as it is 
> simplest to understand and administer.  The current plan is to implement a 
> "max GB per user by class" scheme where, if the class so designates, the 
> maximum allocation per user for a class is configured. GB is to be the unit 
> of allotment, as the unit "share" is variable by installation choice/need, 
> and "process" is variable by hardware in a heterogeneous environment.  A user 
> registry will allow overrides for designated users.  As well an 
> class-inclusion mechanism is to be implemented which, if configured, will 
> restrict use of classes to specific users.  If no limits or inclusion is 
> configured for a class, all users will be permitted unrestricted access to 
> the resources governed by the class.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to