Sounds good to me. Regardless of whether it ultimately gets "adopted"
I think having it in SVN will make it easier to collaboratively
experiment with / evolve the prototype.
I do plan to continue to contribute but may not have as much time to
spend on it as I have done in the past (at least in the near future).
In terms of functional parity with current UIMA, the only significant
remaining gaps I think are:
- Delta CAS support
- Index "auto-protection"
- Some multi-classloader related stuff maybe
Of course the smaller TODOs including cleanup add up to quite a lot
too, and I expect we may want to experiment with different variations
of particular aspects of the impl.
Regards,
Nick
Quoting Richard Eckart de Castilho <[email protected]>:
That is a good next step.
@Nick: what do you think? And... do you plan to continue working on
this code?
Best,
-- Richard
On 29.05.2015, at 17:07, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
Because I'm beginning to like the various trade-offs embodied in much of the
Cas-Obj proposal, in order to work with more easily, I'd like to
get it into a
spot in our SVN.
To enable doing this, I'd like to ask Nick H. to provide a software
grant for
it, and do the IP - clearance for it.
Before I proceed along this path, does anyone have other opinions
on this as a
next step?
-Marshall
