Do you mean when you build from trunk you get
uima-ducc-2.0.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz?
The 2.0.1 is the *next* version of DUCC. When a RC is built all poms are
updated to the next level and committed to the svn. If your complaint is
about the version 2.0.1 instead of say 2.1.0 that is a different matter.
Trivial fix. On the next RC I can choose 2.1.0 as the next version for
DUCC. But this really is not related to the RC. We can change our poms to
whatever version we want post release.

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Lou DeGenaro <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I have two complaints (so far):
>
> 1. When I build from source the resulting zip is:
> uima-ducc-2.0.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
> 2. After installing, a visit to the WS classes page with scroll mode
> preference results in: DataTables warning: table id=system-classes -
> Invalid JSON response....
>
> I will open a Jira for item #2 and deliver a fix shortly.
>
> Lou.
>
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > the Apache UIMA DUCC v2.0.0 RC3 is ready for voting.
> >
> > Same as RC2 with a few fixes:
> > - Disabled maven changes plugin due to its limitation to generate a
> maximum
> > of 100 JIRAs
> > - Improved error handling to detect unavailable ports
> > - Changed maven compile plugin to use java 1.7 instead of 1.6
> > - Fixed JIRA reports for both binary and source distributions
> >
> >
> > Issues fixed in this release:
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.0.0-Ducc%22%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20ASC
> >
> > The Maven artifacts are here:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1063/org/apache/uima/
> >
> > The source and binary zip/tars are here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~cwiklik/releases/uima-ducc/2.0.0/RC3/
> >
> > The SVN Tag Checkout:
> >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/sandbox/uima-ducc/tags/uima-ducc-2.0.0/
> >
> > See: http://uima.apache.org/testing-builds.html for instructions how to
> > test release candidate.
> >
> > Vote open for 72 hours.
> >
> > Please vote on release:
> >
> > [ ] +1 OK to release
> > [ ]  0 Don't care
> > [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
>

Reply via email to