I meant to say that no new JIRAs should be added against a release candidate being voted on.
The 4019 was meant for 2.0.0 I think. The JIRA reporter should decide to defer this or vote RC4 down to include the fix in RC5. On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: > I think new Jiras are fine to be added, but they shouldn't be marked as > "fixed > in" 2.0.0 - it should be for a later release? > > If 4019 isn't in this release, please update the Jira to remove the fixed > in > 2.0.0... > > If that isn't the issue, more investigation needed :-). > > -Marshall > > On 7/20/2015 4:23 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote: > > I just checked my build directory and issuesFixed shows 4516 at the top > of > > the report. Unfortunately, the 4519 was added post RC4. We should not be > > adding new JIRAs while an RC is being voted on. > > > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> issues-fixed missing 4516 and 4519? > >> > >> -Marshall > >> > >
