re: placing files elsewhere, under target/test: good idea! -Marshall
On 8/3/2015 4:17 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
> Ok then
>
> [X] +1 OK to release
>
> I think the tests should be updated though. Not necessarily to delete those
> files
> but rather to place them elsewhere under target, e.g. target/test-output.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Richard
>
> On 03.08.2015, at 21:57, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> those are files generated and never deleted by runnning the CPE tests... The
>> tests were never updated to "cleanup" after themselves.
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>> On 8/3/2015 3:12 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
>>> - Build from sources ZIP with Java 7 with clean repo: OK
>>> - Spot-checking of signatures: OK
>>> - online issue list: OK
>>> - offline issues file: OK
>>> - ${project.version} problem still exists
>>> - spot check release notes: OK
>>> - btw, where are the perl, Python and TCL bindings - are these part of
>>> UIMA C++?
>>> - spot check licenses: OK
>>> - build some code against the RC artifacts fetched from the staging repo: OK
>>>
>>> So far so good, but what are these files in the source ZIP?
>>>
>>> 1361 Defl:N 741 46% 07-28-2015 11:29 84cbf9c6
>>> uimaj-2.8.1/uimaj-cpe/checkpoint.dat
>>> 1368 Defl:N 748 45% 07-28-2015 11:29 ac818f62
>>> uimaj-2.8.1/uimaj-cpe/checkpoint.dat.prev
>>> 0 Defl:N 2 0% 07-28-2015 11:29 00000000
>>> uimaj-2.8.1/uimaj-cpe/checkpoint_synchPoint.xml
>>> 0 Defl:N 2 0% 07-28-2015 11:29 00000000
>>> uimaj-2.8.1/uimaj-cpe/checkpoint_synchPoint.xml.prev
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> -- Richard
>
