Hi, first of all, thanks Marshall :-)
Am 24.08.2015 um 15:08 schrieb Marshall Schor: > I assume you talking about this.svd.useFSCache :-) This has been disabled for > as > long as I can recall. > [...] > > There is currently no option to cache FSs for just some types, other than to > create a JCas cover class for those types and run with JCas enabled. Let me rephrase it: Is it a realistic option for us to introduce something like that? What do you mean with the second part of the sentence? I am currently looking for ways to share information for the same CAS between analysis engines. Should it be possible to use normal java fields of JCas cover classes for this purpose? My annotations are recreated all the time and thus I am loosing the field values ... Best, Peter > -Marshall > > On 8/24/2015 7:42 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >> Hi, >> >> what is the current status on FS caching in svd? The comment says that >> it is not maintained. If activated, an NPE is thrown because the fsArray >> was never initialized. This could be solved by initializing it with a >> non-empty array. (I could create an issue and fix it, if wanted). >> >> In my current (extremely restricted) test bed, the memory consumption >> and runtime drop both by about 30% with fs caching. >> >> I do not have a overview yet: Could there be problems with other parts >> of UIMA if we use the caching? >> >> with a big Ruta hat on: >> Is it an option for us to active the caching on the fly for a specific >> type only? >> >> Best, >> >> Peter >> >> >>
