Another caution - because of ongoing major development in this branch, the snapshot you get probably has a large number of non-compiling files (e.g. the binary serialization ones, not done yet), and may be in a "broken" state from time to time as things get tried and checked in...
-Marshall On 12/2/2015 9:23 AM, Marshall Schor wrote: > possibly, but be aware that little "tuning" has been done so far - most of the > work is just getting things done and past test cases. > > -Marshall > > On 12/1/2015 5:23 PM, Eddie Epstein wrote: >> Sounds promising. Is enough running to compare performance on any >> applications? >> >> Eddie >> >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The version in the branch for this is beginning to come to life; many test >>> cases >>> are now running. >>> >>> The major items yet to be done include binary (plain and compressed) and >>> vinci >>> serialization, and working out a good strategy and set of tools for PEARs >>> and >>> JCasGen. I'll probably work on binary serialization next. >>> >>> -Marshall >>> >
