Yes, you are right! Sorry, I indeed did forget to mention these in the initial mail!
Yes, the binary dist files contain different NOTICE/LICENSE files. The source tarball has only the Apache License and UIMA notices. The binary tarballs also contain the aggregated NOTICE/LICENSE from the third-party JARs that come bundled with it. Cheers, -- Richard > On 28.03.2016, at 20:05, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: > > That link ends with "...source-release.zip". > > I'm referring to the binary.zip, and binary.tar.gz; those are different files, > with different LICENSE/NOTICES, right? > > -Marshall > > On 3/28/2016 1:26 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: >> Hi, >> >> hm, I think it was in the original vote mail: >> >>> Archive with all sources: >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimafit-2.2.0-rc2/uimafit-2.2.0-source-release.zip >> >> ... or I am misunderstanding what you are looking for. >> >> Cheers, >> >> -- Richard >> >>> On 28.03.2016, at 19:19, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> uimaFIT download page shows releasing a bin/tar/zip kind of bundle. >>> >>> I see it's still being built - it's in the target/ of the build-from-sources >>> test that I did. >>> >>> I didn't see it listed in the list of things to check in the VOTE email; is >>> it >>> still planned to be part of the release? >>> >>> -Marshall >> >
