Yup something to fix but not a blocker -jerry On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote:
> The reactor summary for build from sources shows: > > [INFO] uima-ducc-parent > [INFO] Apache UIMA DUCC: uima-ducc-user > [INFO] Apache UIMA DUCC: uima-ducc-common > [INFO] Apache UIMA DUCC: uima-ducc-container > [INFO] Apache UIMA DUCC: uima-ducc-transport > [INFO] Apache UIMA DUCC: uima-ducc-cli > [INFO] Apache UIMA DUCC: uima-ducc-pm > [INFO] Apache UIMA DUCC: uima-ducc-rm > [INFO] Apache UIMA DUCC: uima-ducc-sm > [INFO] Apache UIMA DUCC: uima-ducc-database > [INFO] Apache UIMA DUCC: uima-ducc-orchestrator > [INFO] Apache UIMA DUCC: uima-ducc-agent > [INFO] uima-ducc-duccdocs > [INFO] Apache UIMA DUCC: uima-ducc-web > [INFO] Apache UIMA DUCC: uima-ducc-examples > [INFO] uima-ducc-spawn > [INFO] Apache UIMA-DUCC: uima-ducc > > The convention for naming seems to be missing for the parent, duccdocs, > and spawn. > > -Marshall >
