So what you're saying is basically:

- the trunk of UIMACPP is compatible with UIMA-AS 2.8.1

- no idea about the Pythonnator or alternative/better ways
  of interacting with Python.

Is that correct?

Cheers,

-- Richard

> On 22.08.2016, at 17:26, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> There's been a slow stream of Jira issues against UIMA-CPP, and some of these
> have been fixed (I think) but not (yet) released, mainly because the team 
> talent
> that has worked in this area has been busy with other priorities.
> 
> -Marshall
> 
> 
> On 8/22/2016 10:44 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> scanning around for UIMA and Python, I found references to
>> a bridge allowing to implement UIMA components with Python
>> via UIMA CPP.
>> 
>> Further, I found evidence that UIMA CPP components can be
>> used in conjunction with UIMA AS.
>> 
>> However, UIMA CPP hasn't been updated in a while and the 
>> page on Python-based annotators makes references to ancient
>> versions of Python (2.3 and 2.4).
>> 
>> Does UIMA CPP work with recent releases of UIMA-AS?
>> 
>> Is the Pythonnator something one should be looking at
>> when considering to connect UIMA pipelines with Python
>> logic or are there better/alternative approaches (not Jython)?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> -- Richard
>> 
>> [1] http://uima.apache.org/d/uimacpp-2.4.0/docs/Python.html
>> [2] https://uima.apache.org/doc-uimacpp-huh.html
>> 
> 

Reply via email to