Here is my wishlist ;) https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20Resources
DKPro Core might use external resources more if these issues were resolved. Cheers, -- Richard > On 02.09.2016, at 18:02, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for starting this thread. It would be good to collect the missing > things > people would like to see in external/shared resources. > > 1) support configuration parameters the same way Annotators do. > > 2) ... > > __________ > > Re: timeline for v3 - my guess is we'll need a "beta" release - one where > it's a > release, but users are aware some APIs might get changes, as it gets some > usage > that might reveal some design flaws we want to fix. The beta might be early > in > 2017, and depending on how that goes, have a real release later in 2017. > > -Marshall > > > On 9/2/2016 10:15 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> I was wondering if there is a timeline/roadmap for UIMA v3. >> >> >> I think that the external/shared resources could really use some >> makeover, meaning that they should support the normal configuration >> parameter concepts and not just single strings. This could be (1) quite >> some work and could (2) break backwards compatibility. As for (1), it >> could be realistic that I (or someone else here at Averbis) implement it >> or help to implement it, but most likely not this year. As for (2), this >> is probably rather reasonable for UIMA v3, which introduces a second >> time constraint. >> >> Are there any opinions on the current state of the resources? Does >> anyone use them at all? >> >> I often heard someone or myself say that they lack some expected >> functionality. I assume that DKPro Core does not care as they solved it >> without resources, right? >> >> Best, >> >> Peter
