OK by me. In 3 month's time, I would like these to be gone thru with a human brain making a judgement about closing them, though.
-Marshall On 9/8/2016 5:18 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: > On 02.09.2016, at 23:52, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: >> I see lots of cleanups! Very nice :-) -Marshall > So while doing this, I... > > - assigned missing components > - resolved some issues that had already been addressed > - ... and I slightly kicked the ant-hill by marking some issues > as resolved that I wondered if people still cared about them > > It is nice to see some *do* still care about such old issues, > but still I think it would be a good idea to go through them > with the big shovel see if some old issues can be moved off > the radar. > > Do you think it would be worth bulk-placing a message on > all issues say older than 3-5 years like...? > > "This issue is marked for resolving due to inactivity. If > no further activity is detected on this issue, it will be > closed as 'unresolved' 3 months from now." > > Cheers, > > -- Richard? >
