I tried it - you are correct. -Marshall
On 10/20/2016 3:29 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: > On 20.10.2016, at 21:27, Marshall Schor <m...@schor.com> wrote: >> The interesting part is the Java type of the returned value - it is >> specified as >> >> Class<? extends Resource> >> >> which will throw a cast exception if the implementing class can't be cast to >> Resource. > I believe due to type erasure, this does not throw a cast exception as long > as the value is a Class. > > Best, > > -- Richard
