yes it is :-) I don't object to changing it , but I thought it would hardly ever get used, so I don't mind it being long.
-Marshall On 10/17/2016 3:58 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: > On 17.10.2016, at 21:49, [email protected] wrote: >> + SelectFSs<T> includeAnnotationsWithEndBeyondBounds(); // AI known as >> "strict" >> + SelectFSs<T> includeAnnotationsWithEndBeyondBounds(boolean >> endWithinBounds); // AI > This is a quite humongous for a method, isn't it ;) > > We could just use the name "strict()", but based on the conventions, that > would imply > that "strict(false)" is the default. Maybe "lax()"? > > Best, > > -- Richard
