[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15974212#comment-15974212
]
Peter Klügl commented on UIMA-5362:
-----------------------------------
The name of the update site origins in the subsite, not in the currently build
site.
> Ruta: accumulative ticket for fixing flaws listed in 2.6.0 rc1 review
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: UIMA-5362
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5362
> Project: UIMA
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Ruta
> Affects Versions: 2.6.0ruta
> Reporter: Peter Klügl
> Assignee: Peter Klügl
> Fix For: 2.6.1ruta
>
>
> Ruta: accumulative ticket for fixing flaws listed in 2.6.0 rc1 review
> Reported by Richard:
> Compared tag with source: OK
> Checking POMs: OK
> - I don't understand why you exclude UIMAJ-Core classes in the
> "enforce-compatibility" profile of Ruta. Shouldn't semver be removed after
> switching to japicmp?
> POM check yields no changes in dependencies, skipping re-check of licenses.
> Build on OS X: OK
> Spot check signatures: OK ( and I actually have Peter's key in my keyring )
> Install from Update Site into Eclipse: OK
> - Update site identifies itself as
> "file:/D:/work/ruta/ruta-eclipse-update-site/target/eclipse-update-site/ruta"
> - A proper name would be better
> - Before being able to install Ruta, I also need to add the normal UIMA
> update site. I though that update sites can refer to each other?
> Code breaks out of boxes in PDF documentation on page 26.
> Indentation depth in code examples in the documentation is not always the
> same.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
