Hi,
Am 17.05.2017 um 21:15 schrieb Richard Eckart de Castilho: > > We could turn uimaFIT into a module of uimaj ;) +1 :-) > > I didn't feel comfortable upgrading the uimaj-core dependency to 2.10.0 and > then > only to increase the last digit. If felt that it would have been less > customer-friendly > to do that then to increase the middle number. > > Anyway, it was probably a bad idea anyway as Peter has pointed out. Argh.... I did not want to point out anything, especially I did not want you cancelling the rc. My intention was just to decide if the next ruta release is a bugfix or a minor one. I am totally fine if we do a minor in case the uima version is upgraded to a new minor version. I would like to see that the uima projects use somewhat the same strategy when selecting the next release number, but I am also fine if there are differences. Best, Peter
