On 2. Oct 2018, at 00:02, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: > > part of the issue seems to be that the checksum things are set up to assume > the > artifact follows the Maven naming conventions. Unfortunately, the uimaj-core > artifacts name their jars etc without the version part (e.g. uimaj-core, not > uimaj-core-2.10.3), so the checksums don't find the artifacts... > > Wondering what the best fix is for this...
Very strange because I didn't change the patterns - only the algorithm used by the Ant checksum target. So if it doesn't work now, it probably didn't work before? Or the fact they are missing now is due to a change in the ASF parent POM. We can use the checksum-maven-plugin to generate artifact checksums and to attach these to the Maven build such that they should be deployed to the repository on release. I have filed another commit doing that under https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5856. ---- Trying to build uima v2, I'm seeing messages such as these during the build: ---- [INFO] --- maven-javadoc-plugin:3.0.1:jar (attach-javadocs) @ uimaj-test-util --- [WARNING] Are you sure about the <javadocVersion/> parameter? It seems to be 1.8.0 ---- But I have no idea where they come from. I already tested locally upgrading to the maven-javadoc-plugin 3.0.1 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-512) but even with that version, I get the warning. I also have no idea where the 1.8.0 value would be coming from - "mvn help:effective-pom" says that the "javadocVersion" parameter value is "1.7". Might be still a but in maven-javadoc-plugin 3.0.1. ---- While we are at it: Maven keeps telling me that we shouldn't use the stanza <prerequisites> <!-- 2.2.0 is broken when deploying - checksums invalid --> <!-- 2.2.1 doesn't work --> <maven>3.3.9</maven> </prerequisites> in the parent pom, because that stanza is only relevant for Maven plugin modules. If we want to generally enforce the use of a specific Maven version, we should be using the enforcer plugin instead. Is there any reason we have that stanza in the UIMA parent pom? Cheers, -- Richard
