[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16717379#comment-16717379
 ] 

Jerry Cwiklik commented on UIMA-5928:
-------------------------------------

Seems like throwing an exception = -1 (dont send SIGTERM). Is dunno even a 
valid option? Is it possible for the RM to not know if a resource is 
preemptable or not? To me this should be a boolean predicate (unless there is a 
valid reason for the dunno)

> DUCC Agent quiesce should wait (forever) for non-fairshare displatchables to 
> complete before shutting down
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: UIMA-5928
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5928
>             Project: UIMA
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: DUCC
>            Reporter: Lou DeGenaro
>            Assignee: Jerry Cwiklik
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.2.3-Ducc
>
>
> {color:#121212}When stop_ducc -c agent@node --quiesce-then-stop is issued, 
> the agent should immediately stop any managed PIDs running in a pre-emptable 
> class, but wait for all managed PIDs running in a non-preemptable class to be 
> terminated before stopping.{color}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to