Hi, thanks for the pointer Marshall - no idea why I missed this...
I have replaced the artifacts at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uimafit/3.0.0-rc1/ with the ones from target/checkout/target (no re-running of the build) and they do contain a good issues file. I wouldn't call it a new RC because there was no new build, I just uploaded the wrong files and this is now corrected. So is it ok to continue with this vote thread? -- Richard > On 21. Jan 2019, at 16:32, Marshall Schor <m...@schor.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > In "SVN", the release:perform step checks out the proposed "tag" and redoes > the > entire "build" using that. The artifacts that are deployed to the staging > repo > (repository.apache.org) are from that checkout. > > (I think the "GitHub" version works the same way?) > > The artifacts that are are supposed to be the RC should also come from that > checkout/build. > > I'm guessing that the RC files are incorrectly being taken from the wrong > spot? > > If so, to correct this, please repost an RC2 without rerunning the build, but > having the artifacts for the RC come from the "checkout" (release:perform) > spot, > instead. > > -Marshall
