For unknown reasons, the Jira issues fixed report seems to have failed.

Investigating... -Marshall

On 4/1/2019 12:07 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> Hi, uimaj-3.0.2 rc3 is posted and ready for voting.
>
> This RC removes the change for UIMA-5869 which is being deferred to a later 
> release.
>
> It also changed the version number back to 3.0.2 from 3.1.0.
>
> Other changes from **rc1**: 
> ===========================
> The implementation of Subiterator was refactored and
> corrected in several edge cases.  Just to give an idea: one of the edge cases
> involved a coveredBy iteration, without type-priority, where the flag to skip
> over the same begin/end/type annotations if found.  This had incorrectly 
> assumed
> these were at the beginning of the iteration, but in this case, you could have
> multiple items, then skip over maybe multiple items which are equal (same
> begin/end/type) to the bounding annotation, followed by more items.
>
> With the subiterator fixed (there were some edge case bugs), I have run a 
> large
> system using v2 and v3, and compared the results, and found them to be the 
> same.
>
> The CasCompare routine, used in debugging differences between v2 and v3 
> output,
> was improved to fix a bug in handling sorting of some collections, and to only
> display root-causes of differences.  Note that the CasCompare routine is at 
> this
> point more or less for internal use; it needs more work for wider use.
>
> The issues fixed are here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/UIMA/versions/12344592
>
> The source and binary tars/zips are here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uv3/uimaj/3.0.2-rc3/artifacts/
>
> The eclipse update subsite is here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uv3/uimaj/3.0.2-rc3/eclipse-update-site-v3/
>
> The maven staging repo is here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1224/
>
> The SVN tag: 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uv3/uimaj-v3/tags/uimaj-3.0.2/
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0   Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Marshall
>
>

Reply via email to