[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16857672#comment-16857672
]
Marshall Schor commented on UIMA-6054:
--------------------------------------
I'm thinking this may cause backwards compatibility issues, for this use case:
The default empty constructor is removed for Type XXX. But there exists
somewhere else, in a separate compilation unit or project, a type XXX_S whose
parent is XXX. Then when XXX_S is loaded to run or compile, you get an error.
Perhaps a better fix would be to add an annotation
@SupressWarnings("deprecation") to these?
> JCasGen generating warnings by creating deprecated constructors
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: UIMA-6054
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6054
> Project: UIMA
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: UIMA
> Affects Versions: 3.0.2SDK
> Reporter: Hai-Son Nguyen
> Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: patch-uima-6054v1.txt
>
>
> The JCasGen process produces classes with a protected empty no parameter
> constructor.
> Base classes that have extended the Annotation class
> (org.apache.uima.jcas.tcas.Annotation) are now getting warnings that the
> constructor Annotation() is deprecated.
> The constructor documentation states, "Never called. Disable default
> constructor" but the presence of other constructors already serve this
> purpose.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)