Well, I wrote something incorrect, I think, re: the "signing" of the eclipse update site jars.
Our current process (when signing is to be done) is to not sign them when voting on a release candidate, but sign them once the vote passes. If and when this vote passes, the jars can be signed. Cheers. -Marshall On 4/5/2020 9:45 AM, Marshall Schor wrote: > > > signature on source-release: OK > IssuesFixed: OK > compare svn w/ source-release: OK. > build from sources: Done on Windows, OK > Eclipse artifacts are not signed causing a warning when installing into > eclipse > Install into Eclipse 4.15 - OK. Created a new project, looked at files. > Release_notes and readme look fine. > spot check maven artifacts: ok > > spot check licenses/ notice: ok > > I noticed that the eclipse artifacts are still not signed. > This should be a straight-forward process, that would give > "installers" more confidence that they're installing something > official and not corrupted. It seems in this stage of the > world (?!?) this would be a good thing to do... :-) > > [X] +1 OK to release > > -Marshall Schor >