[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17228390#comment-17228390
]
Richard Eckart de Castilho commented on UIMA-6294:
--------------------------------------------------
Mind, there seems to be a bug in the provided test code:
{code}
assertEquals(2, selection2.size()); // Fails!
assertTrue(selection1.contains(fixture[0]));
assertTrue(selection1.contains(fixture[7]));
{code}
If I change this to {{assertTrue(selection2...}}, the tests run for me with the
changes in PR-84.
> SelectFS.at(annotation) does not return the correct result
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: UIMA-6294
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6294
> Project: UIMA
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: uimaj
> Affects Versions: 3.1.1SDK
> Reporter: Mario Juric
> Assignee: Richard Eckart de Castilho
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.2.0uimaFIT
>
> Attachments: SelectFSIssue.zip
>
>
> Please have a look at verify_selectAt in the SelectFSTest class. The call
> jCas.select(Annotation.class).at(subType) returns some annotation covered by
> subType, but not a single of those two that exactly have the same bounds as
> subType (fixture[0] and fixture[7])
> [^SelectFSIssue.zip]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
