Hi,
I think it's totally fine not to deploy the feature artifact to maven
central if it is not required by the update site.
The source it the official released artifact, the jars on maven central
are the commonly used ones, the plugin and feature bundles are just
additional tooling. I think there no need to deploy any of them to maven
central with the current update site setting.
Best
Peter
Am 20.05.2022 um 22:10 schrieb Richard Eckart de Castilho:
Hi all,
there is a problem in the interplay between building Eclipse Feature
modules
using Tycho and the maven-checksum-plugin.
Tycho attaches e.g. a file called `p2content.xml` to the build, and the
maven-checksum-plugin generates a checksum file then which contains this
filename, but the file ends up in the Maven repository as e.g.
`org.apache.uima.ruta.feature-3.2.0-p2metadata.xml`.
https://github.com/nicoulaj/checksum-maven-plugin/issues/137
It checksum file still contains a valid checksum and the checksum
checking rules
configured on the ASF Maven Repository even accept it. But during release
valiation, it is annoying because the checksum file cannot be checked
using
`sha512 -c <file>.sha512`. So I think it would be better not to deploy
such
a file to the Maven repo.
The maven-checksum-plugin is by default running in the `verify` phase
of the
build which comes directly before the `install` phase. So we cannot insert
e.g. an antrun task there which would fix the checksum files unless we'd
reconfigure the maven-checksum-plugin to run in an earlier phase. Also
needing an antrun task to fix this is kind of annoying.
This problem happens in particular with Eclipse Feature modules. I believe
that it should be ok to not deploy Eclipse Feature modules to Maven
repositories
for the moment.
Of course if we want to work with "true" Maven P2 update sites which
bundle
nothing and just contain pointers to other Maven artifacts, we would
probably
have to deploy the features as well. But maybe the checksum-maven-plugin
issue 137 might be fixed by then? The only project currently experimenting
with a Maven P2 update site is the UIMA Java SDK - so thinking about this
would only become relevant with its 3.4.0 release - and even then we could
still postpone the experiment to a later release.
So my suggestion for the moment would be to
* disable deployment of Eclipse features (and Eclipse update sites) to
Maven repositories
* wait for checksum-maven-plugin issues #137 to get resolved (maybe
help out there)
Does that sound reasonable? Anybody having a better idea?
Alternatives that I currently see are:
* live with the wrong filename in the sha512 file
* try if running maven-checksum-plugin in the `integration-test` phase
is sufficent and
then add an antrun script which tries fixing the names in the sha512 file
Cheers,
-- Richard
--
Dr. Peter Klügl
R&D Text Mining/Machine Learning
Averbis GmbH
Salzstr. 15
79098 Freiburg
Germany
Fon: +49 761 708 394 0
Fax: +49 761 708 394 10
Email: peter.klu...@averbis.com
Web: https://averbis.com
Headquarters: Freiburg im Breisgau
Register Court: Amtsgericht Freiburg im Breisgau, HRB 701080
Managing Directors: Dr. med. Philipp Daumke, Dr. Kornél Markó