Hi Pablo thanks for the update!
> On 5. Sep 2023, at 21:59, Pablo Duboue <pablo.dub...@gmail.com> wrote: > > A suitable delivery mechanism for releases for the project has been > identified (Docker image) and the hope is to have access to a UIMA CPP > Docker Hub slot whenever the chair files for an INFRA issue for it. Hm, it fell completely off my radar that I may have a todo here. Sorry! For what it's worth, would it be ok for you to file that Docker issue with INFRA? If INFRA needs my thumbs up, I'll be happy to give it to them as a comment. There would also be an alternative to using DockerHub, namely using GitHub: https://docs.github.com/en/packages/working-with-a-github-packages-registry/working-with-the-container-registry I recently moved some of my (non-Apache) projects there when DockerHub threatened to change their open source hosting model ... which they rolled back again after a few days since the community didn't like it at all ... at that point I was already gone. Do you have an opinion regarding DockerHub vs GitHub container registry? I can also see in the GitHub web UI that there have been commits comming into the UIMA-CPP repo - I do watch it for all activity, but for some reason I cannot remember having seen any issue mails. Are you committing all your changes directly to main? It would be good to open issues and corresponding pull requests for those issues - those generate useful mails. Cf. https://github.com/apache/uima-uimaj There area also useful templates here: https://github.com/apache/uima-uimaj/tree/main/.github Cheers, -- Richard
