Hi Richard,
hi all,
thank you, Richard, for your input and initiative. I’m definitely in
favor of redesigning the UIMA website!
I really like the layout, though the big question is always whether to
create a one-pager with anchor links or subpages. I also think it’s
great that the ecosystem has been updated. I have at least one more
project that could be added there. What’s still missing are references
on how to cite UIMA as an architecture.
How did you expect the process to change (both in the current stage and
overall)? Is there a specific process to follow or a GitHub branch for
this? I can well imagine rolling up my sleeves and lend a hand. 😉
Best,
Giuseppe
Am 03.11.26 um 07:20 schrieb Richard Eckart de Castilho via dev:
Hi all,
I have had a look at maybe modernizing the UIMA website a bit. Here is the
first throw at that:
https://uima.staged.apache.org/
The site is built from here:
https://github.com/apache/uima-site/tree/new-site-v1
There is some background information on the site (and how it relates to the old
site) here:
https://uima.staged.apache.org/migration.html
Comments are welcome :)
On the current site I have mixed content changes with layout changes. However,
we should
probably discuss them separately.
One particular content change is that I dropped the
oldhttps://uima.apache.org/management.html
page from the new site deferring simply to the conventions of the ASF in
general on releases,
voting, PMC membership, etc. However, the old page mentioned e.g. that new
members would need
to be voted in with a "3/4 positive vote" which I didn't even knew existed ;)
Cheers,
-- Richard
