+1

Thanks for your work

Xianjin Ye <xian...@apache.org> 于2024年6月27日周四 19:34写道:

> +1(binding)
>
> I checked:
> [x] build from src package with `./build_distribution.sh`
> [x] License in source code is correct
> [x] Notice is correct
>
>
> BTW, I think it would be great to add links(to PRs) in the release note,
> but that's not a blocker.
>
> On 2024/06/25 02:55:30 Junfan Zhang wrote:
> > +1.
> >
> > Thanks for your work
> >
> > On 2024/06/19 08:30:32 Enrico Minack wrote:
> > > Hello Uniffle Community,
> > >
> > > This is a call for vote to release Apache Uniffle (Incubating) version
> > > 0.9.0-rc2.
> > >
> > > Release notes:
> > >      https://uniffle.apache.org/download/release-notes-0.9.0
> > >
> > > The release candidates:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/uniffle/0.9.0-rc2/
> > >
> > >
> > > Git tag for the release:
> > >      https://github.com/apache/incubator-uniffle/tree/v0.9.0-rc2
> > >
> > > Keys to verify the Release Candidate:
> > >       https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/uniffle/KEYS
> > >
> > > GPG user ID:
> > > Enrico Minack <enric...@apache.org>
> > >
> > > As the DISCLAIMER-WIP shows, this release still left some license
> > > problems, which will be gradually resolved during incubation.
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number
> of
> > > votes are reached.
> > >
> > > Please vote accordingly:
> > >
> > > [] +1 approve
> > > [] +0 no opinion
> > > [] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > >
> > > Checklist for reference:
> > >
> > > [] Download links are valid.
> > > [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
> > > [] Source code distributions have correct names matching the current
> > > release.
> > > [] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each Uniffle repo.
> > > [] All files have license headers if necessary.
> > > [] No unlicensed compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> > >
> > > More detail checklist please refer:
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Incubator+Release+Checklist
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Enrico Minack
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to