>From the perspective of https://lists.apache.org/thread/ntp60vwyfdyclln5lvhqdsox9kn8s428, the vote for 0.9.2 rc1 has passed, but now there's a vote for rc2 initiated. What is the reason for this? Did the IPMC vote not pass? Could you please provide an explanation in the relevant email?
Thanks, Jie Yang zhengchenyu <zhengche...@apache.org> 于2024年12月31日周二 20:07写道： > Hello Uniffle Community, > > This is a call for vote to release Apache Uniffle (Incubating) version > 0.9.2-rc2. > > Release notes: > https://uniffle.apache.org/download/release-notes-0.9.2 > > The release candidates: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/uniffle/0.9.2-rc2/ > > The Staging Repository: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuniffle-1058/ > > Git tag for the release: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-uniffle/tree/v0.9.2-rc2 > > Keys to verify the Release Candidate: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/uniffle/KEYS > > GPG user ID: > zhengchenyu (for apache release create at 20240819) < > zhengche...@apache.org> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number > of votes are reached. > > Please vote accordingly: > > [] +1 approve > [] +0 no opinion > [] -1 disapprove with the reason > > Checklist for reference: > > [] Download links are valid. > [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. > [] Source code distributions have correct names matching the current > release. > [] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each Uniffle repo. > [] All files have license headers if necessary. > [] No unlicensed compiled archives bundled in source archive. > > More detail checklist please refer: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Incubator+Release+Checklist > > Thanks, > zhengchenyu
